Many companies have been relying on personality profiles to help figure out whether job candidates have what it takes to succeed. Use of these instruments increased dramatically when lawyers began telling companies to stop disclosing meaningful data about employees to prospective employers.
Although most staffing experts agree that there is no substitute for knowing how a candidate actually performed and behaved in past work situations, companies felt they no longer could get reliable data from business references.
But the validity of personality tests has always been questionable:
Many I/O psychologists, noting they were designed for coaching and counseling, caution against using these tests for selection
Nearly 50% of those taking the tests for selection purposes admit to cheating / putting down answers they think will get them hired
Some managers –anxious to fill jobs-simply give their favorite candidates the answers in advance
Validation Studies –usually conducted by the test vendors, often don’t meet strict scientific standards –e.g. –“reliability” and fail to account for the “self-fulfilling prophesy” effect
The scary thing to contemplate is this: what kinds of people who would even *try* to finesse a personality test?
Posted by: Wallace Mildew | July 14, 2006 at 10:43 AM